<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LIDOBS Conference 2014 &#187; WG6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wp2.eulivingdonor.eu/category/wg6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wp2.eulivingdonor.eu</link>
	<description>Hight Quality Practices on Living Donation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:07:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>WG6. Bibliography &amp; other reference materials</title>
		<link>http://wp2.eulivingdonor.eu/wg6-bibliography-other-reference-materials/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=wg6-bibliography-other-reference-materials</link>
		<comments>http://wp2.eulivingdonor.eu/wg6-bibliography-other-reference-materials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 16:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin LIDOBS]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WG6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WGs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp2.eulivingdonor.eu/?p=2626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h5 style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://wp2.eulivingdonor.eu/wg6-quality-indicators-and-certification/" class="with-icon-inside"><span class="icon" style="background-image:url(http://wp2.eulivingdonor.eu/wp-content/themes/expo18/img/icons/0115.png)"></span>Back to WG6</a></h5>
<div class="one-half"></p>
<h3>Bibliography</h3>
<p><div class="toggle"><div class="toggle-title expanded"><strong>Volker K (2000)</strong> <em>High security standards in organ donation and transplantation IS0 9001</em>.</div><div class="toggle-inner" style="display:block"> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10935708" target="_blank" class="with-icon-inside"><span class="icon" style="background-image:url(http://wp2.eulivingdonor.eu/wp-content/themes/expo18/img/icons/0093.png)"></span> </a>Certificate<br />
for organ procurement organisation in Germany.</div></div></p>
<p><div class="toggle"><div class="toggle-title"><strong>Ruin H, Pronovsot P, Diette G (2001)</strong> <em>From a process of care to a measure:</em>.</div><div class="toggle-inner"> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11769752" target="_blank" class="with-icon-inside"><span class="icon" style="background-image:url(http://wp2.eulivingdonor.eu/wp-content/themes/expo18/img/icons/0093.png)"></span> </a>This paper outlines the steps in developing and implementing process measures of quality. Developing a process measure includes defining the purpose of and audiences for the measures, choosing the clinical area to evaluate, organizing the assessment team, choosing the component of the process to measure, writing the indicator specifications, performing preliminary tests of feasibility, reliability and validity, and determining scoring and analytical specifications. Given the growing evidence in the literature regarding the impact of care, and an evolving understanding of how to develop and implement process of care measures as outlined here, the future should bring the development and implementation of quality indicators that are rigorously developed and that will provide insights into opportunities to improve the quality of care.</div></div></p>
<p><div class="toggle"><div class="toggle-title"><strong>Manyalich M, Guasch X, Gomez MP, Páez G, Teixeira L; ODEQUS Consortium. (2013)</strong> <em>Organ Donation European Quality System: ODEQUS project</em>.</div><div class="toggle-inner"> <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24314932" target="_blank" class="with-icon-inside"><span class="icon" style="background-image:url(http://wp2.eulivingdonor.eu/wp-content/themes/expo18/img/icons/0093.png)"></span> </a>Differences in the number of organ donors among hospitals cannot be explained only by the number of intensive care unit beds used or neurologic patients treated. The figures obtained are influenced by the organizational structure of the donation process and how efficient it is. The Organ Donation European Quality System (ODEQUS) is a 3-year project (from October 2010 to September 2013) co-financed by the European Agency for Health and Consumers (EAHC20091108) which aims to define a methodology to evaluate organ procurement performance at the hospital level. ODEQUS&#8217;s specific objectives are to identify quality criteria and to develop quality indicators in three types of organ donation (after brain death, after cardiac death, and living donation). Those tools will be useful for hospitals&#8217; self-assessment as well as for developing an international auditing model. A consortium has been established involving 14 associated partners from Austria, Croatia, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom, as well as five collaborating partners from Greece, Hungary, Malta, Slovenia, and Turkey. The project has been established in three steps: 1) Design of a survey about the use of quality tools in a wide sample of European hospitals; 2) Development of quality criteria and quality indicators by the project experts. The main fields considered have been organizational structures, clinical procedures, and outcomes; and 3) Elaboration of an evaluation system to test the quality indicators in 11 European hospitals. Two types of training have been designed and performed: one concerns the development of quality criteria and quality indicators, whereas another is focused on how to use evaluation tools. Following this methodology, the project has so far identified 131 quality criteria and developed 31 quality indicators. Currently, the quality indicators are being tested in 11 selected hospitals.</div></div></p>
<p><div class="toggle"><div class="toggle-title"><strong>Mark L. Barr et al. (2006)</strong> <em>A Report of the Vancouver Forum on the Care of the Live Organ Donor: Lung, Liver, Pancreas, and Intestine Data and Medical Guidelines</em>.</div><div class="toggle-inner"> <a href="http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rainer_Gruessner/publication/7051009_A_report_of_the_Vancouver_Forum_on_the_care_of_the_live_organ_donor_lung_liver_pancreas_and_intestine_data_and_medical_guidelines/file/3deec537b77b298f05.pdf?ev=pub_ext_doc_dl&amp;origin=publication_detail&amp;inViewer=true" target="_blank" class="with-icon-inside"><span class="icon" style="background-image:url(http://wp2.eulivingdonor.eu/wp-content/themes/expo18/img/icons/0319.png)"></span></a>An international conference of transplant physicians, surgeons, and allied health professionals was held in Vancouver, Canada, on September 15 and 16, 2005 to address the care of the live lung, liver, pancreas, and intestine organ donor. The Vancouver Forum was convened under the auspices of the Ethics Committee of The Transplantation Society. Forum participants included over 100 leaders in organ transplantation, representing many countries from around the world, including participants from the following continents: Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North and South America.</p>
<p>The objective of the Vancouver Forum was to develop an international standard of care for the live lung, liver, pancreas and intestinal organ donor. This Vancouver Forum followed a conference convened in Amsterdam on the care of the live kidney donor (1, 2). [...]</div></div><br />
</div>
<div class="one-half last"></p>
<h3>ODEQUS references</h3>
<h3>Other references</h3>
<p><div class="toggle"><div class="toggle-title expanded"><strong>Satisfaction With Life Among Living Kidney Donors: A RELIVE Study of Long-Term Donor Outcomes</strong>, 2014</div><div class="toggle-inner" style="display:block"><a href="http://journals.lww.com/transplantjournal/Abstract/publishahead/Satisfaction_With_Life_Among_Living_Kidney_Donors_.98045.aspx" target="_blank" class="with-icon-inside"><span class="icon" style="background-image:url(http://wp2.eulivingdonor.eu/wp-content/themes/expo18/img/icons/0093.png)"></span></a> Background: Little is known about living kidney donors&#8217; satisfaction with life (SWL) after donation. We compared donors&#8217; SWL to previously reported general population samples and investigated predictors of donors&#8217; SWL. </div></div><br />
</div><div class="clear"></div>
<h3>Upload files</h3><div class="front-end-upload-parent"><form action="" method="post" class="front-end-upload-flags"><div class="front-end-upload"><p>There is a conflict with the active theme or one of the active plugins. Please view your console to determine the issue.</p></div><input type="hidden" name="_wpnonce" id="_wpnonce" value="7cfc925dba" /><div class="front-end-upload-submit"><button type="submit" />Upload</button></div></form></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wp2.eulivingdonor.eu/wg6-bibliography-other-reference-materials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
